I've tried to make this site as informative as possible. There are links beside the main text that will lead you to political, historical, money saving and survivalist websites and there are links which are of general interest too.

Anonymous commenting has been enabled for this blog. Opposing views are fine. Comments are rarely deleted, so, have at me.

If you do not much favor the blog article content, that's OK too. Just grab yerself a cup of coffee, sit back, relax and peruse some of the fascinating and informative links.

(Note: On the left column, below the blog archive, is a list of 304 Christian leaders. Click on them for their Wiki link)

ADULT CONTENT WARNING: Occasionally, material will be posted on this blog that is intended strictly for adults. (No porn, but possibly violence or bad language) Kids, check with your parents for permission to view material on this site. Parents, it's a cold, cruel and evil world out there. If your kids have questions about some of the material on this site, make it a teachable moment for them.

Enjoy your visit, comments are welcome.

If you're into food, visit http://chowdaddy.blogspot.com/ ,the only mainstream WN food blog.

EHD pro-life videos are located at the bottom of the page. EHD DOES NOT endorse the post content of this blog.

Scroll down for posts.

Saturday, July 26, 2014

A Well Regulated Militia......

...being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

So states the text of what was originally the Fourth Amendment. The Bill of Rights originally had 12 Amendments, but the first two did not get ratified, thus we ended up with ten and the Fourth Amendment became the Second Amendment. There has been much argument as to the meaning of the Second Amendment. The Heller decision (DC v. Heller 2008) was the first Supreme Court decision to declare that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms for self defense.

From Heller:
"(1) The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. Pp. 2–53.
(a) The Amendment’s prefatory clause announces a purpose, but does not limit or expand the scope of the second part, the operative clause. The operative clause’s text and history demonstrate that it connotes an individual right to keep and bear arms. Pp. 2–22.
(b) The prefatory clause comports with the Court’s interpretation of the operative clause. The “militia” comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense. The Antifederalists feared that the Federal Government would disarm the people in order to disable this citizens’ militia, enabling a politicized standing army or a select militia to rule. The response was to deny Congress power to abridge the ancient right of individuals to keep and bear arms, so that the ideal of a citizens’ militia would be preserved. Pp. 22–28.
(c) The Court’s interpretation is confirmed by analogous arms-bearing rights in state constitutions that preceded and immediately followed the Second Amendment. Pp. 28–30.
(d) The Second Amendment’s drafting history, while of dubious interpretive worth, reveals three state Second Amendment proposals that unequivocally referred to an individual right to bear arms. Pp. 30–32.
(e) Interpretation of the Second Amendment by scholars, courts and legislators, from immediately after its ratification through the late 19th century also supports the Court’s conclusion. Pp. 32–47.
(f) None of the Court’s precedents forecloses the Court’s interpretation. Neither United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U. S. 542 , nor Presser v. Illinois, 116 U. S. 252 , refutes the individual-rights interpretation. United States v. Miller, 307 U. S. 174 , does not limit the right to keep and bear arms to militia purposes, but rather limits the type of weapon to which the right applies to those used by the militia, i.e., those in common use for lawful purposes.
(2) Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons. Pp. 54–56."
Well, that's nice, but what did the founding fathers really have in mind with the Second Amendment? Let's look at it again:

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. We think we know what these words mean today, but what was the common usage in 1789? To determine this I used Samuel Johnson's 1792 edition of "A Dictionary of the English Language."

In those days a "militia" was defined as "the trainbands" or trained band of men. Specifically, a company of trained civilians, in England or America, from the 16th to the 18th century.

"Regulate" was defined as "to adjust by rule or method" and "to direct".

"Arms" were defined as "weapons of offense" and "war in general", so the Miller decision which restricted they type of weapons a person could own was incorrect as it was expected that citizens could own, provided they were not insane, any such weapon used in warfare.

Now let's look at the Second Amendment as the verbiage was understood by the men who wrote it:

"A well directed band of civilians, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and carry weapons of offense used for war in general, shall not be infringed.


In Heller, the Supreme Court did get right that the Second Amendment was there to prevent tyranny and that "the right of THE PEOPLE" was also an individual right.

The specifier "being necessary to the security of a free State" is critically important because it separates a militia from the government. Civilian militias can be used to assist the government in times of emergency, such as if the British are invading, but the specifier clause has a different duty for the militia.

There is a famous quote by Thomas Jefferson to wit:

"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Here it is in context:

 "The British ministry have so long hired their gazetteers to repeat and model into every form lies about our being in anarchy, that the world has at length believed them, the English nation has believed them, the ministers themselves have come to believe them, and what is more wonderful, we have believed them ourselves. Yet where does this anarchy exist? Where did it ever exist, except in the single instance of Massachusets? And can history produce an instance of a rebellion so honourably conducted? I say nothing of it's motives. They were founded in ignorance, not wickedness. God forbid we should ever be 20. years without such a rebellion.[1] The people can not be all, and always, well informed. The part which is wrong will be discontented in proportion to the importance of the facts they misconceive. If they remain quiet under such misconceptions it is a lethargy, the forerunner of death to the public liberty. We have had 13. states independant 11. years. There has been one rebellion. That comes to one rebellion in a century and a half for each state. What country ever existed a century and a half without a rebellion? And what country can preserve it's liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is it's natural manure. Our Convention has been too much impressed by the insurrection of Massachusets: and in the spur of the moment they are setting up a kite to keep the hen yard in order. I hope in god this article will be rectified before the new constitution is accepted." - Thomas Jefferson to William Stephens Smith, Paris, 13 Nov. 1787."

Thus, the importance of "being necessary to the security of a free State" is that the Second Amendment was specifically written to allow the militia to detach itself from the State and overthrow the government that has become tyrannical by the use of force. The militia then goes from a team player whose function is to assist the government to the ultimate check of destroying the government.

UPDATE: Some additional commentary. For additional clarification, it is the word "free" in the clarifier sentence that is important. As defined, "being necessary to the security of a non-tyrannical/non-oppressive State"(I.E. free State) as opposed to, "being necessary to the security of the State" makes the Second Amendment essentially a command for the militia to overthrow an oppressive government rather than an equivocal suggestion.

Also, based on the definition of "Arms" at the time, ANY weapon of war would be permissible to own.(Voiding the 1934 National Firearms Act) The definition also includes the phrase "and armor for defense" so MRAPS can be sold to civilians, who aren't insane.

TO ARMS!!!! TO ARMS!!!! It's fast approaching now or never.

Tuesday, July 15, 2014

Liberals: The Andromeda Strain

I suppose I could drag this post out with a lot of filler and the use of big words which would have some appeal in the pseudo-intellectual circle of readers, but, nah I'm just going to get to the meat.

I've previously posted on what should be done with libtards, but I'm going to revisit the topic. We must first understand that liberals are a virus upon the Earth. Liberals/libtards are evil.

From a political standpoint, we tend to see things as equal opposites, i.e. Liberal or Conservative, Democrat or Republican etc. This view is basically that we are the same but have differing opinions which we can work out through dialogue in order to come to a reasonable compromise. Radio legend Rush Limbaugh routinely puts liberal callers to the front of the line in hopes of generating a good discussion with them.

There is nothing we need to discuss with evil. Instead of chatting with libtards, we need to round them up, push them into the showers and give them a good session of Zyklon B aromatherapy.

I'd love to be looking through the window, drinking a beer, watching the swine breathe their last and enjoy the fact that God is finally dealing with the deadly evil virus known as liberals.

The result of unchecked liberalism is worldwide death. Even Islam is a form of liberalism where the men are free to rape boys and rape and mutilate women and kill infidels (AKA non-perverts who have a full set of teeth and an IQ over 40). 

Being a Godly Christian involves discipline, love and true compassion rather than a feigned compassion which is used for deviant purposes. Christians are, however, under no compulsion to tolerate evil.

SHTF day IS coming. Will you be part of the problem or part of the solution? You had better start giving it some thought. 

From Romans 1:19-23 

19 "For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. 20 For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world,[a] in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse. 21 For although they knew God, they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Claiming to be wise, they became fools,..."

Tuesday, July 1, 2014

Nancy Pelosi: Dipshit Emeritus

Where does one start when discussing Nancy Pelosi? Hmmmm, some background info on her:

"Nancy Patricia D'Alesandro Pelosi  is the Minority Leader of the United States House of Representatives and served as the 60th Speaker of the United States House of Representatives from 2007 to 2011. She is the only woman to have served as the House Speaker and to date is the highest-ranking female politician in American history
A member of the Democratic Party, Pelosi represents California's 12th congressional district, which consists of four-fifths of the city and county of San Francisco. The district was numbered as the 5th during Pelosi's first three terms in the House, and as the 8th from 1993 to 2013. She served as the House Minority Whip from 2002 to 2003, and was House Minority Leader from 2003 to 2007, holding the post during the 108th and 109th Congresses. Pelosi is the first woman, the first Californian and first Italian-American to lead a major party in Congress. After the Democrats took control of the House in 2007 and increased their majority in 2009, Pelosi was elected Speaker of the House for the 110th and 111th Congresses."
So, with that kind of background, one would think Nancy was pretty sharp. Think Again. Let's look at some quotes from this supposedly sharp woman:

"1.“The Bible tells us in the Old Testament, ‘To minister to the needs of God’s creation is an act of worship. To ignore those needs is to dishonor the God who made us.’ On this Earth Day, and every day, let us pledge to our children, and our children’s children, that they will have clean air to breathe, clean water to drink, and the opportunity to experience the wonders of nature.”
Nice. The only problem is the Old Testament contains no such quote.
2. “This initiative is funded by the high end – we call it Astroturf It’s not really a grassroots movement.”
Just gut-wrenching hypocrisy -Astroturf is all the Dem Socialists know, so naturally she accuses her political opposition of what her side does in spades.
3. “Every week we don’t pass a Stimulus package, 500 million Americans lose their jobs.”
Yeah, she actually said that.
4. I’m confident…I’m hopeful  that we’ll have a (health care) bill as a Christmas present for the American people.
This, after polls were showing a majority of the American people were against it, after several weeks of bruising (for Dems) town hall meetings in which citizens voiced their opposition to the bill, and after hundreds of thousands showed up in Washington to protest the bill… 
5.. You go through the gate. If the gate’s closed, you go over the fence. If the fence is too high, we’ll pole-vault in. If that doesn’t work, we’ll parachute in. But we’re going to get health care reform passed for the American people.
At the time, 61% of the American people were saying it was time for Congress to scrap ObamaCare.
Imagine how many jobs we could create if everyone quit their jobs!    Wait…..
Needless to say, natural gas is a fossil fuel.
8. “I think it’s unAmerican.” (to enforce immigration law).
She said that to a Hispanic audience, and refused to clarify the statement when Fox News called her office later on for comment.
This was in response to a question from George Stephanopoulos about the wisdom of spending millions of dollars on birth control funding in the stimulus package.
This stunning demonstration of political condescension was meant to calm the fears of the public – trust them – they know what’s good for us…
To quote Doug Powers:
“In the real world, demonstrating lunacy of this magnitude is known as a “cry for help” and an intervention involving large nets, straight-jackets and electric shock therapy is in order. But not in Washington, DC, where free-range crazies are allowed to pick pockets, loot futures, and all too often get re-elected”.
Tragically, she was re-elected, and House Dems voted to keep her as their leader."
Pelosi then decides to visit the border to see the magnitude of the human crisis the Dimocrats have forced upon us:
She then says"Every child, every person, has a spark of divinity in them and is therefore worthy of respect,” reinforced the female Democrat in a statement, "[because] we are all God's children." 
 Pelosi attempting to portray herself as a Christian is about as believable as Stalin trying to portray himself as a Christian. (Stalin killed at least 10 million white Christians and Pelosi would gladly kill many more than that if she had the chance to implement policies she supports.)
People being people, we tend to look at political things in terms of Conservative vs Liberal, Republican vs. Dimocrat, Compassionate vs. Uncompassionate, but how we really need to look at things is Good versus Evil.
From John 8:44: "44 You are of your father the devil, and you want to do the desires of your father. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth because there is no truth in him. Whenever he speaks [a]a lie, he speaks from his own nature, for he is a liar and the father of [b]lies."
Dimocrats ARE of their father the devil, as are libtards. Who lies more than the left? They lie about global warming, gun control, illegal immigration and just about everything else. Libtards simply do not know the truth. They are evil. Rush Limbaugh likes to put liberal callers at the front of the line, as a courtesy. Instead of doing shit like this, we need to be figuring out ways of exterminating libtards using the most efficient industrial methods available.
According to Opensecrets.org, Pelosi's net worth varies from around 34 million dollars to 204 million dollars depending on how her investments are doing and yet Pelosi advertises herself as just another one of the common folk......her retarded constituency believes her spew.
God has let evil run the Earth ever since God let the devil offer the entire world to Jesus if he would follow satan. It is important to remember that pure evil is pure selfishness, while pure good is pure selflessness. At the end of the day, there is nothing more selfish (or more ignorant) than a libtard. Evil also needs an environment of stupidity in which to thrive. This is but one of the reasons libtards want to dumb down people via the public education system. Stupid minions make controllable minions. The Dimocrats offer the illusion of intellect, but their entire fund of knowledge is built upon a foundation of lies.

Sunday, June 8, 2014

Hitler and Reagan: Two Peas in a Pod.

OK, this may seem like a really odd comparison, however, there are a couple of things to keep in mind. First, the victors get to write the history books and it is in the interest of the victor to make the enemy look as bad as possible and, second, you need to realize you have been brainwashed by Zionist media for the last 70 years.

In the Bible, the Jews are repeatedly punished for turning away from God. Generally, many thousands of them are destroyed save for a small remnant and this continues through the book of Revelation.

Thus, there is a growing number of Christians who see Hitler's punishment of Jews as God's wrath against the Zionists.

By comparison, Reagan's dislike of communism was a dislike of Zionists as over 80% of the founding fathers of the Soviet Union were Zionists as was Stalin.

Hitler and Reagan both liked children.

Hitler inherited a disastrous economy and turned it around within two years:

So, how did Hitler do it?  Unlike Obama, who appoints fiscal morons to oversee the economic recovery,  Hitler  did at least have the G-2 to appoint capable economic advisers. One of whom was a fellow by the name of Hjalmar Schacht.  Hjalmar broke up the trade unions and imposed certain wage controls.

The government then expanded the money supply through the use of EFFECTIVE and necessary public works programs while limiting inflation. The Nazis limited imports and mandated domestic manufacturing and production of certain goods.  These measures greatly reduced unemployment.  Banks were denationalized and decentralized.

It took Reagan a bit longer to turn the economy around, but he also had a credible plan:

"The four pillars of Reagan's economic policy were to reduce the growth of government spending, reduce the federal income tax and capital gains tax, reduce government regulation, and tighten the money supply in order to reduce inflation."

Both men were effective public speakers who knew how to motivate a nation.

Both men had a great pride in their respective nations.

Hitler was a decorated war veteran who legitimately earned his awards unlike LBJ and John Kerry.

Ronald Reagan, contrary to what many libtards think was a WWII veteran:

"Ronald Wilson Reagan enrolled in a series of home-study Army Extension Courses on 18 March 1935. After completing 14 of the courses, he enlisted in the Army Enlisted Reserve on 29 April 1937, as a Private assigned to Troop B, 322nd Cavalry at Des MoinesIowa. He was appointed Second Lieutenant in the Officers Reserve Corps of the Cavalry on 25 May 1937.  On June 18 of that year Reagan, who had just moved to Los Angeles to begin his film career, accepted his Officer’s Commission and was assigned to the 323rd Cavalry.

Lieutenant Reagan was ordered to active duty on 19 April 1942In January 1944, Captain Reagan was ordered to temporary duty in New York City to participate in the opening of the sixth War Loan Drive. He was assigned to the 18th AAF Base Unit, Culver CityCalifornia on 14 November 1944, where he remained until the end of the war."

At the end of the day, Hitler had a lot more in common with Ronald Reagan than he did with Stalin or Mao.

Just sayin'.

Thursday, May 22, 2014

Glenn Beck: Zionist Shill

John 8

44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.45 And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not.

I used to like to listen to Glenn Beck, largely because he was one of the few conservative voices on national media. One thing that was a constant irritant, however, was Beck's need to cry and show the females in his audience that he was in touch with them.

Basically, it struck me that Beck was some sort of metrosexual whipped bitch. I could easily imagine him coming home after an easy day's work and having the following conversation:

Glenn: "Honey I'm home."

Wifey: "That's good timing dear; I just pinched off a steamy hot log that has lots of corn chunks in it for you to nibble on."

Glenn: "Wow darling, that's great! Thanks. I can't wait to dig in."

.......................whipped bitch.

Anyhoo, as for Glenn being a Zionist shill, many white nationalists tend to think of all Jews as bad, while many neocons think of all Jews as good. The quote at the top of this post tells the story. There are Jews who are the children of Abraham and there are people who are of their father the devil who pretend to be Jews. Revelation 7 tells us that the final Jewish remnant will be 144,000 Jews who have accepted Jesus. From John 14:6 "Jesus said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me."

There is some dispute as to whether the 144k is actually the totality of the remnant, but the final number will be small, thus most people who claim to be Jews today are actually evil Zionists who have the devil as their father. Beck has sold his soul to the devil. 

The final Jewish remnant are a peace loving people, the "Jews" who lead Israel are murdering Zionists. I was listening to Beck yesterday when he mentioned getting a package that contained a small cube with RF2 stamped on it. Beck went on to explain that this was one of at least a ton of similar cubes buried in, I believe, a Polish forest. The RF, Beck explained, stood for Reichs Fatt. This was supposed to be a bar of soap made out of Jewish fat from the "there's no business like shoah business" Holocaust. The soap made from Jew fat story has been debunked for years.* Still, Beck keeps it alive. Glenn's support of evil Zionists is every bit as problematic as the Left's support of Islam. The disastrous effects will be the same.

Glenn is leading his sheep down the path of total destruction. Glenn is also a Mormon, a religion founded by fraudster Joseph Smith, who, apparently managed to find a natural source of LSD......"When Smith was 17, the angel Moroni appeared to him and told him the location of two golden plates, on which was written the history of two ancient Native American Christian tribes. Joseph went to the site and found golden plates written by Ether, Mormon, Lehi and Nephi (ancient Native American authors), and a brass plate consisting of Hebrew scripture quotations and genealogies written by Laban.

Also discovered at the site was a breastplate and the "Urim and Thummim," a pair of stones that Smith said assisted him in his translation of the ancient plates. Unfortunately, he was not allowed to remove the artifacts from the site immediately. He was directed to return to the site at each Autumn Equinox for four years, until 1827."

From Luke 21:8 "And he said, “See that you are not led astray. For many will come in my name, saying, ‘I am he!’ and, ‘The time is at hand!’ Do not go after them."


The RIF soap article:

'Jewish Soap'

By Mark Weber
"One of the most lurid and slanderous Holocaust claims is the story that the Germans manufactured soap from the bodies of their victims. Although a similar charge during the First World War was exposed as a hoax almost immediately afterwards, it was nevertheless revived and widely believed during the Second. [1] More important, this accusation was "proved" at the main Nuremberg trial of 1945-1946, and has been authoritatively endorsed by numerous historians in the decades since. In recent years, though, as part of a broad retreat from the most obviously untenable aspects of the "orthodox" extermination story, Holocaust historians have grudgingly conceded that the human soap tale is a wartime propaganda lie. In their retreat, though, these historians have tried to dismiss the soap story as a mere wartime "rumor," neglecting to mention that international Jewish organizations and then Allied governments endorsed and sanctioned this libelous canard.

Thursday, May 8, 2014

Forgotten History: Civil War Coffee

Although it is not something most people stop and think about, have you ever wondered how coffee ended up as our national drink instead of tea?

You can thank the Union Army for that. Most historians are aware that the Nazis pumped their troops full of amphetamines during WWII to keep them going. (Ya know, Blitzkrieg) Far fewer know that the Union Army was pumping their men full of coffee for the same purpose.

While it is generally accepted that the superior industrial base was ultimately responsible for the Union victory, of equal importance, in my opinion, was the fact that the Union kept their troops pumped full of caffeine.

The top photo is of a reproduction Union coffee wagon as supplied by the United States Christian Commission. Although the USCC helped mostly Union soldiers, they also supplied some Confederate soldiers as well. From their website:

"There is a group of heroes that served upon the battlefields of the Civil War without rifles or cannons. They came with bibles, bandages and the love of Christ. These were the heroes of the U.S. Christian Commission.

Where was God during this terrible suffering and bloodshed? The answer lies most notably in the stories of heroism exhibited by the United States Christian Commission and the delegates that so fearlessly and faithfully served the soldiers with the gospel. Formed in the fall of 1861 by the Young Men’s Christian Association to “take active measure to promote the spiritual and temporal welfare of the soldiers in the army, and the sailors and marines in the navy, in co-operation with chaplains and others.

During the war, five thousand delegates volunteered and distributed over $6,000,000 worth of goods and supplies (in 1860's valuation) to the soldiers and sailors of the Union army on the battlefields, camps, hospitals and prisons. They also served the soldiers in grey when the opportunity arose. It is estimated that the service rendered by the delegates of the Christian Commission equal the continuous work of one man for 658 years!"

As an aside, nicotine, via the tobacco leaf, helped keep the Southern soldier on his toes, though to a much less extent than his Union counterpart. Nevertheless, now and again Union and Confederate soldiers would meet up and swap coffee for tobacco. Another factor in Northern performance was the fact that the North had better rations.

From the U.S Army Quartermaster Foundation website: "Who shall have this?" Sergeant John W. Fuller asked in a voice loud enough for all the assembled troops to hear. He stood beside two ordinary army blankets laden with precious contents. One contained forty-five carefully divided mounds of ground coffee, the other an equal number of piles of sugar. Together, they represented a four-day ration of coffee and sugar for Company C of the 100th Regiment of the Indiana Volunteer Infantry.

Sergeant Fuller was pointing to one of the heaps of coffee. No matter how carefully they tried, it was impossible to divide the coffee equally; the company had no scales. As a result, each mound was always a bit larger or smaller than the others. In order to distribute the ration, First Sergeant Sanford W, Meyers, facing away from the coffee and the company, read from the muster roll and called out a name at random. Private Theodore F. Upson stepped forward to claim this most important part of a soldier's ration, then, its sweetener.

Salt pork and hardtack, the rest of the marching ration were to be weighed and issued later by the regimental commissary but that wasn't important now. The company focused its attention on the blankets. The weather in this third week of June, 1864 was wet and unseasonably cool, as it had been for the four previous weeks of the campaign to Atlanta. The source of that next, all sustaining cup of hot coffee, now ranked in importance with the Confederate enemy entrenched less than a mile away - Private Upson returned to the ranks with his fair, if not quite equal share of coffee, and the issue continued, by random name, till each pile of coffee and sugar had been claimed."

Union coffee was typically issued green and had to be roasted and ground, not always an easy task in a combat environment, but eventually the troops got to guzzle their java.

After the war ended, returning Union troops kept up their desire for coffee and eventually the South would come to demand it as well.

Tuesday, April 22, 2014

Bible Says: Coal burning Bad

Leviticus 19:19

     19 “You shall keep my statutes. You shall not let your cattle breed with a different kind. You shall not sow your field with two kinds of seed, nor shall you wear a garment of cloth made of two kinds of material.

Hmmmm, sounds like good advice:

Ronald Boaston
Ronald Boaston
Brandi Gonyer-Boaston (Source: Facebook)
Brandi Gonyer-Boaston (Source: Facebook)

On Thursday, police arrested Ronald Boaston, 41, for the murder of Brandi Gonyer-Boaston, 28.  Gonyer-Boaston was found in a running car parked in a Fulton County field. Police say she was murdered in the city of Toledo and taken to Fulton County, where hunters later found her. The coroner ruled the cause of death as asphyxiation.

During Boaston's arraignment, bond was set at $1 million with no 10 percent. 
His next courtroom appearance has been scheduled for April 21, because he did not have an attorney.
"It's not closure. He took from me what I can't get back. He can't give that back to me," said Cindey Gonyer, Brandi's mother.
A memorial fund has been set up for Brandi Gonyer-Boaston. Donations can be made at any Huntington bank and will go toward funeral costs and care for her six children.
Video link HERE

Monday, March 24, 2014

Why Liberals Love Islam

The short answer is that they are on the same team. Romans 8:44 "You are of your father the devil, and your will is to do your father's desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks out of his own character, for he is a liar and the father of lies."

Rush Limbaugh had recently commented that Secretary of State John Kerry would be sending homosexuality experts to Uganda to discuss Uganda's anti-gay laws. Uganda is now a Christian nation, but most, if not all, of the 57 (where have I heard that number before?) Islamic states prohibit homosexuality. (At least on paper. The Bacha Bazi boys of Afghanistan would call that into question.)

So, why don't we have a great libtard cry for Muslim countries to stop being anti-gay and anti-women. American feminists should be screaming bloody murder at the Islamic practice of female genital mutilation.

I discussed in a previous post the lies of Islam. We see in Romans 8:44 that satanism/zionism is founded on lies and we know from decades of experience that liberals/Dimocrats entire ideology is founded on lies. The global warming hoax for example. Also, the libtard indoctrination of our public school students is another example.

Liberals, Muslims and zionists (By zionists, I'm not talking about the true Jewish remnant mentioned in Revelation) are ALL on the same team.

The world is collapsing all around us. It should be remembered that ever since the devil put his arm around Jesus (See Matthew 4:8-9 et. al.) and offered the earth to Jesus, that the devil was given control of the Earth. Thus, earthly treasures are evil treasures. 

So, the bottom line is that it should be no surprise that liberals do not dislike Islam the way they do Christianity. Jesus is the truth and the light and libtards are of their father the devil.

We tend to think, at least in political terms, of Dimocrat and Republican, Liberal and Conservative and so on. Conservatives need to reshape the debate into what it really is...................a battle between good and evil. 

John 3:31 "The one who comes from above is above all; the one who is from the earth belongs to the earth, and speaks as one from the earth. The one who comes from heaven is above all. 32 He testifies to what he has seen and heard, but no one accepts his testimony. 33 Whoever has accepted it has certified that God is truthful. 34 For the one whom God has sent speaks the words of God, for God[i] gives the Spirit without limit. 35 The Father loves the Son and has placed everything in his hands. 36 Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life, but whoever rejects the Son will not see life, for God’s wrath remains on them."

Thursday, January 23, 2014

The World's First Photograph..........................Jesus

"The first photo of the full Shroud of Turin was taken in 1898 by Secondo Pia. It shows the surprising feature that the image on the negative was clearer than the positive image."

The photo of Jesus at the top of the post is the below negative image taken with the Helmut negative film app. set on color negative. The result was then single color filtered via Aviary. If you look at the top image for a minute or two you will note it is actually a positive image. Note particularly the lips and left eye. (Viewer's perspective)

So, how do I know this is the actual face of Jesus when radiocarbon dating puts the age of the Shroud of Turin at the late 1300's? There was a fire in the 1500's that damaged the shroud and altered the true date of the Shroud. The best proof, however, is the Sudarium of Oviedo. this was the face cloth that covered Jesus and it's provenance is not in question:

"The experiments with the model head and the study of the stains also show that when the man died his head was tilted seventy degrees forward and twenty degrees to the right. This position further suggests that the man whose face the sudarium covered died crucified.

There are smaller bloodstains at the side of the main group. It would appear that the sudarium was pinned to the back of the dead man's head, and that these spots of blood were from small sharp objects, which would logically be the thorns that caused this type of injury all over Jesus' head.

The medical studies are not the only ones that have been carried out on the sudarium. Dr. Max Frei analysed pollen samples taken from the cloth, and found species typical of Oviedo, Toledo, North Africa and Jerusalem. This confirms the historical route described earlier. There was nothing relating the cloth to Constantinople, France, Italy or any other country in Europe.

An international congress was held in Oviedo in 1994, where various papers were presented about the sudarium. Dr. Frei's work with pollen was confirmed, and enlarged on. Species of pollen called "quercus caliprimus" were found, both of which are limited to the area of Palestine.

Residues of what is most probably myrrh and aloe have also been discovered, mentioned directly in the gospel of john, 19:39-40, "Nicodemus came as well...and he brought a mixture of myrrh and aloes...They took the body of Jesus and bound it in linen cloths with the spices, following the Jewish burial custom."

The stains were also studied from the point of view of anthropology. The conclusion was that the face that had been in contact with the sudarium had typically Jewish features, a prominent nose and pronounced cheekbones.

Finally, the very fact that the cloth was kept at all is a sign of its authenticity, as it has no artistic or monetary value at all. All the studies carried out so far point in one direction, with nothing to suggest the contrary the sudarium was used to cover the head of the dead body of Jesus of Nazareth from when he was taken down from the cross until he was buried.

3: Coincidence with the Shroud

The Sudarium alone has revealed sufficient information to suggest that it was in contact with the face of Jesus after the crucifixion. However, the really fascinating evidence comes to light when this cloth is compared to the Shroud of Turin.

The first and most obvious coincidence is that the blood on both cloths belongs to the same group, namely AB.

The length of the nose through which the pleural oedema fluid came onto the sudarium has been calculated at eight centimetres, just over three inches. This is exactly the same length as the nose on the image of the Shroud.

If the face of the image on the Shroud is placed over the stains on the sudarium, perhaps the most obvious coincidence is the exact fit of the stains with the beard on the face. As the sudarium was used to clean the man's face, it appears that it was simply placed on the face to absorb all the blood, but not used in any kind of wiping movement.

A small stain is also visible proceeding from the right hand side of the man's mouth. This stain is hardly visible on the Shroud, but Dr. John Jackson, using the VP-8 and photo enhancements has confirmed its presence.
The thorn wounds on the nape of the neck also coincide perfectly with the bloodstains on the Shroud.

Dr. Alan Whanger applied the Polarized Image Overlay Technique to the sudarium, comparing it to the image and bloodstains on the Shroud. The frontal stains on the sudarium show seventy points of coincidence with the Shroud, and the rear side shows fifty. The only possible conclusion is that the Oviedo sudarium covered the same face as the Turin Shroud."

Some interesting things about the picture of Jesus are that his features ARE caucasian, as opposed to the revisionist history view that Jesus was negroid. He almost certainly was olive-skinned, however.

Also, how would one expect God to look if he was to manifest himself as human? The photo of Jesus indicates he was the typical "Joe six pack" of his day. There was nothing unusual about him. Had he manifested as a glowing white lighted atypical human then faith in him would not have been necessary. In short, he HAD to look ordinary.

From Matthew 13:55 and Mark 6:3 we know Jesus was a carpenter. There's an old Amish saying.."Hands to work, hearts to God." It is also logical that God would not only have manifested himself as a "common" human, but that he would have been a blue collar tradesman as well.

At any rate, faith is faith and you have it or you don't. If you have been given the gift of sight then you will know, and be very humbled, to be looking at the face of Jesus.